By Jyri Komulainen
Raimon Panikkar (b. 1918), a Catalan-born Hindu-Christian, is a popular theorist of interreligious discussion. This examine offers an in depth research of his theology of religions. at the foundation of the newest resources on hand, it seems that even his "radical pluralism" can't eschew the inherent difficulties attribute of pluralistic theologies of religions. in contrast to different pluralists, Panikkar doesn't sign up for the Enlightenment culture. as an alternative, his plea for the transformation of current religions is predicated on an idiosyncratic "cosmotheandrism," which pulls on either primordial non secular traditions and existentialist philosophy. the must haves of interreligious discussion, as defined in his paintings, hence entail dedication to a selected cosmology and mode of awareness.
Read Online or Download An Emerging Cosmotheandric Religion?: Raimon Panikkar's Pluralistic Theology Of Religions (Studies in Christian Mission) PDF
Similar interior decorating books
This article bargains with Clement of Alexandria's interpretation of evil and unfastened will within the context of the emerging Christianity, the impacts of close to jap and Greek concept on him, his changes from St Augustine, and the way his interpretation affected the increase of the japanese Christian concept. The publication additionally lines in short the topic of man's own target in existence, perceived by way of Clement because the suppression of his nature.
Facadism - the protection of ancient facades, the production of facsimiles in entrance of latest structures and the ornamental workouts of postmodernism - is accused of destroying architectural innovation, of divorcing the internal and external of structures and of lowering townscapes to theatre units. Its defenders describe facadism because the manner city culture and growth stroll hand in hand.
This quantity explores Gregory Of Nyssa's idea of human nature. It argues that the common use Gregory makes of "phusis"-terminology is not just a terminological predilection, yet relatively the main to the philosophical and theological foundations of his suggestion. ranging from an outline of the theological panorama within the early 360's the research first demonstrates the that means and relevance of common human nature as an analogy for the Trinity in Cappadocian theology.
This article discusses options in foodstuff processing and maintenance from the palaeolithic interval via to the overdue Roman Empire. It considers the indispensable position foodstuff know-how performed within the political, monetary, and social textile of historic society.
Additional resources for An Emerging Cosmotheandric Religion?: Raimon Panikkar's Pluralistic Theology Of Religions (Studies in Christian Mission)
However, despite this explicit refusal there still seem to persist some ambiguities in Panikkar’s thinking. Cf. BS, 17, 33, in which he speaks on the absolute, although very obscurely. As I see it, this is first of all a question of a symbolic way of speaking, which does not permit us to make ontological conclusions. See MRDP, 13, in which Panikkar explicitly says that he uses the word ‘God’ as a symbol. See also CSR, 78; CD, 63. 27 It is worth noting that it seems to be at exactly the same time that Panikkar’s theological vision was beginning to emerge in its mature form.
There is a real danger of misunderstanding if the hermeneutical issue is ignored. First, it should be noted that, for Panikkar, writing is meditation. He does not consider himself writing primarily to disseminate some ideas. Instead, writing is, in his own words, “intellectual life,” which is in turn “spiritual existence” and as such participation in the life of the universe. Through writing he sees himself participating in reality itself: in the process of writing, “the self ” living in the language uses the writer as a tool, which means that the “transparency” of the author is a crucial factor.
I have had to make some methodological decisions in this respect, and I would like to explain how I have tried to pay sufficient attention to these chronological dynamics in my reading of Panikkar. 1. Problems and Limitations Concerning the Sources of the Study With regard to sources, I will confine my study to the most essential work of Panikkar in the three decades extending from the beginning of the 1970’s to the beginning of the new millennium. My analysis will concentrate on the texts that seem to be loaded with theological significance.